It feels as if we just elected a president. But no, Campaign 2012 has pretty much kicked off this week with the Fox "News" suspensions of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum--pending their confirming or denying their candidacies--and the following little gem from Mike Huckabee:
Video at: abcn.ws/ehUDQw
Seriously? First, Mike, did you learn nothing from the Dan Quayle v Murphy Brown catastrophe of 1992? Some of you may be too young to remember this classic political goof (the debacle of the attempted criticism, not the VP, who was also a debacle and goof--but that's another story). If so, read the original Time magazine article here. Did Huckabee really think aligning himself with Mr. Quayle was a good thing? Did he think at all? And is that a trait we want in a president?
Second, Huckabee doesn't have the criticism correct. At least Mr. Quayle was correct in the storyline, even if his opinion was more akin to the 1940s than the 1990s. Hollywood was not glamorizing Ms. Portman's pregnancy. It was awarding her an Oscar for a highly acclaimed role that she played in "Black Swan" (which I am renting when it is comes out on Netflix). Ms. Portman was definitely not pregnant in the movie (where she plays a ballerina, for god's sake). "Black Swan" has nothing to do with pregnancies. I'm surprised Huckabee didn't say something about the lesbian love scene--but maybe Mike liked it.
Huckabee has pretty much alienated a huge demographic here: single parents of all types (single mothers, single fathers, widowed mothers and fathers, deserted mothers and fathers, divorced mothers and fathers with deadbeat exes, etc.). For simplicity, because Huckabee has insulted such a large group of people, let's focus on single, never-been-married mothers for the purpose of this blog.
Single motherhood can occur by accident or on purpose. There are hundreds of thousands of successful single women who have reached the midpoint of their childbearing years without finding the man of their dreams but with the desire and knowledge that they want and can support children of their own. Thanks to sperm banks and adoption options, these women make wonderful mothers to hundreds of thousands of children. They have planned their children, cherish them and raise wonderful human beings--just like old-fashioned two-parent families.
Now we come to Huckabee's traditional view of the single mother: poor, uneducated, young who are seen as a drain on government resources. True, these young women have a struggle ahead of them--but Huckabee and his fellow stuck-in-the-1940s Republicans are doing teens and young adults absolutely no favor by cutting the budget of Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood provides contraceptives, STD screening and information for millions of women each year--and helps young woman from becoming Huckabee's idea of the single mother. The Republicans may be against abortion, but by coming out anti-Planned Parenthood, they are attacking one of the most effective community organizations available to young people and family planning (get it Huckabee? Planned Parenthood). By cutting Planned Parenthood's government funding, there is likely to be an increase in single parents living on government subsidies as well as an increase in the abortion rate, which has been declining annually for the past 20 years. According to one source, almost each Title X dollar saves $4 in Medicaid costs at a later date.
I'm a huge supporter of family planning. Anyone who is emotionally mature enough and financially able to support a family is a prime candidate for parenthood. By mature, I mean that person or couple is willing and eager to put their needs behind that of their children, to be responsible, loving parents and try their darnedest to raise equally responsible, loving, educated people. Mothers and fathers do not need to be married or heterosexual to succeed as a parent. There are plenty of middle-aged, middle-class, married, heterosexual couples out there who fail miserably as parents, financially and/or emotionally.
Parenthood is the absolute toughest job out there. It is not for teenagers. But we, as a society, have to give these kids the education and resources (contraceptives) they need to avoid becoming a statistic, including funding public school sex ed courses that go beyond "Just Say No" and increasing--not decreasing--the funding for Planned Parenthood and similar organizations.
As we seem to be suddenly plummeting into the muddy depths of Campaign 2012, everyone needs to remember that both sides of the political aisle have pluses and minuses. But even if moderate Republicans have some good fiscal policy ideas, the moderate Democrats will never hear those ideas over the loud voices of the far-right conservative moralists (the ones who usually end up having sex with prostitutes of either sexual persuasion). Republicans need to reign in their moral judgments and clean up their own house (that is, toss out the prostitutes and hypocrites). Democrats, we need you to focus on what we all need to hear: how to create real jobs that can support real, college-educated people who are entering the workforce by the millions each year.
(up next in Campaign 2012: What to Do After Undergrad? Grad School or McDonald's--a Higher Education Dilemma)

Recent Comments